|
Swindled: The Dark History of Food Fraud, from Poisoned Candy to Counterfeit Coffee | 
| Author: Bee Wilson Publisher: Princeton University Press Category: Book
List Price: $26.95 Buy New: $13.47 You Save: $13.48 (50%)
New (27) Used (7) from $13.47
Rating: 1 reviews Sales Rank: 19673
Media: Hardcover Edition: 1st Pages: 400 Number Of Items: 1 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.6 Dimensions (in): 9.1 x 6.2 x 1.3
ISBN: 0691138206 Dewey Decimal Number: 363.1926 EAN: 9780691138206 ASIN: 0691138206
Publication Date: September 8, 2008 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping: Expedited shipping available Shipping: International shipping available Condition: Brand New. 100% money back guarantee. All books shipped from Strand Bookstore, New York City, USA.
| |
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Bad food has a history. Swindled tells it. Through a fascinating mixture of cultural and scientific history, food politics, and culinary detective work, Bee Wilson uncovers the many ways swindlers have cheapened, falsified, and even poisoned our food throughout history. In the hands of people and corporations who have prized profits above the health of consumers, food and drink have been tampered with in often horrifying ways--padded, diluted, contaminated, substituted, mislabeled, misnamed, or otherwise faked. Swindled gives a panoramic view of this history, from the leaded wine of the ancient Romans to today's food frauds--such as fake organics and the scandal of Chinese babies being fed bogus milk powder. Wilson pays special attention to nineteenth- and twentieth-century America and England and their roles in developing both industrial-scale food adulteration and the scientific ability to combat it. As Swindled reveals, modern science has both helped and hindered food fraudsters--increasing the sophistication of scams but also the means to detect them. The big breakthrough came in Victorian England when a scientist first put food under the microscope and found that much of what was sold as "genuine coffee" was anything but--and that you couldn't buy pure mustard in all of London. Arguing that industrialization, laissez-faire politics, and globalization have all hurt the quality of food, but also that food swindlers have always been helped by consumer ignorance, Swindled ultimately calls for both governments and individuals to be more vigilant. In fact, Wilson suggests, one of our best protections is simply to reeducate ourselves about the joys of food and cooking.
|
| Customer Reviews:
You are not what you think you eat November 17, 2008 Harry Eagar (Maui) It sounds like a page ripped from today's headlines: Chinese babies dying from fraudulent baby milk. However, British food journalist Bee Wilson's "Swindled" isn't quite that up to the minute. Her chapter on dying Chinese babies is not about today's cow's milk tainted with melamine but 2004's scandal about fake formula. But the recurrence nicely illustrates her thesis that food fraud has always been and will always be with us. And, she says, people in advanced countries with well-established regulatory agencies should not be so confident they are, indeed, what they think they eat. From plutocrats being palmed off with sevruga caviar at beluga prices (but who cares?), to mislabeled Chilean sea bass to (although she doesn't mention this one) Starbucks' selling cheap Central American java for genuine Kona, there are recent frauds aplenty. Wilson is, no contest, the best stylist writing about food for newspapers in English (in the Sunday Telegraph), and her chapters on the early history of food fraud are strong stuff. She makes the point that the longer the chain from producer to eater, the more opportunities for chicanery, and the more difficult it becomes to detect the fraud. Scientific aids begin with Frederick Accum in 1820, one of several odd ducks Wilson profiles in the history of food safety; but scientific frauds have more than kept pace with detection methods. In her later chapters, Wilson displays a bee in her bonnet about GMOs (although she has little to say about this); and a touching but misplaced faith in the superiority of organic food, however defined. Her complaint that people cannot recognize good food because they have never tasted it is at least partly valid. However, her favorite target -- white bread -- is not as good an example as she thinks. Europeans have long preferred soft white bread to a "crusty, malty loaf," but this was not solely a matter of social pretentiousness, as Wilson thinks. Considering the prevalence of abscesses in our ancestors' teeth, eating hard bread was torture.
|
|
|
Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |